I learnt how to use Final Cut before Premiere (albeit after some years in CyberLink PowerDirector and Sony Vegas) and found FCPX to be incredibly intuitive. Personally, I don’t think I could ever choose between Premiere and FCPX, as both have a lot of great uses and functionality. In terms of audio editing and colour grading, both pieces of software have similar capabilities, so it really does come down to your personal preference. Like Premiere’s Nested Sequences feature, you can also make use of Compound clips in Final Cut to keep things together.įinal Cut’s interface is much simpler, but after a while of using it you’ll find yourself able to do almost everything that is possible in Premiere (except colour labels!), with various other useful features exclusive to FCPX. With everything magnetically sticking to each other, it can make syncing easier, as it’s a bit harder to accidentally move a track elsewhere without realising. In Final Cut’s magnetic timeline, you’ll find yourself with a Primary Storyline, upon which everything else is attached to automatically, eg. However don’t be fooled by cosmetic simplicity! Final Cut contains a lot of powerful features to rival any editing software. If you have prior experience of video editing from college or university, Premiere may be easier for you to pick up.įCPX uses a trackless ‘magnetic timeline’, which appears initially less complicated and easier to use. extra versions in varying aspect ratios for social media). You can also have several sequences open at once in a tab format, a bit like a web browser, which can prove useful if you're creating lots of different pieces within the same project (eg. Your timeline is referred to as a Sequence, and within this you can make use of Nested Sequences. With Premiere, you can make use of Bins, and my personal favourite, colour labels! However FCPX posesses the option to use keyword tags more easily, along with assigning roles to your imported media, both of which are invaluable to me when I'm editing with Final Cut.Īdobe Premiere also makes use of a more traditional style timeline using tracks, which can prove useful when needing to separate lots of different audio, visual and effects tracks. Your personal preference will also come into play.įCPX and Premiere have very different interfaces, although many of the features are very similar.Īs I mentioned last month, footage organisation is a huge part of any editing process. Adobe however have moved onto a subscription based model, meaning you would be paying continuously, either on a monthly or annual plan, to continue to use the software. FCPX is (currently) available as a one-off purchase with unlimited updates, so you don’t need to worry about paying for a subscription. I would advise also taking into account the system specifications ( Premiere) ( FCPX) for each software, as this can also dictate what your computer will be able to handle.Īnother really important aspect to consider when choosing editing software is the cost. Final Cut is exclusively an Apple product, which means that unless you’re technical enough to come up with a workaround ( Hackintosh) it’s unlikely that you could use FCPX on anything other than a Mac. Adobe Premiere can be used on either a Mac or a Windows PC, meaning that further down the line if you decide to change your hardware, you can continue to use Adobe products. When choosing the right software for you, it's really important to assess your stylistic needs, as well as the capability of the hardware you posess. Regardless of how you do it, if you can put together a compelling story, you’re good at what you do. It doesn’t really matter what brand you use. It’s just a tool, the same as a camera, laptop or any creative technology. I’d like to start off by saying that I truly believe a good editor is not bound by software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |